Section 5, Schedule, Sections 7 and 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition suit, petitioners challenged the authenticity of the order for payment of maintenance allowance, under which the Family Court awarded 15 for the minor. The petitioner, who was the special child, was directed to pay restitution allowance at a rate of Rs., 000, did not appear before the Family Court and did not submit a written statement and instead he was sent to the section of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. 7 moved the application in which some technical skill interim rehabilitation was identified at the rate of Rs. 15,000. For a particular child who was undergoing treatment monthly, there was no higher rate of rehabilitation, however, the amount of rehabilitation could be adjusted at the time of the final determination, if the applicant cared for his own defense, he would have to immediately Should have presented on His written statement brings to the court every month the evidence such as his monthly income, the interim care nst order, the interim care order, the constitutional jurisdiction cannot be disturbed unless it is dealt with. It appears that the petition did not pay a single son to his estranged son, no matter of superior interference, the order issued by the family court was dismissed by the petitioner, the petition was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
