Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 On bail pleading to the murder of the applicant, it was alleged that the weapon was not recovered by mere ambassador through "Lalkara", under the circumstances.

1979 P Cr. L J 975

[Karachi]

Before Sajjad Ali Shah, J

MUHAMMAD AKRAM-Applicant

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No. 962 of 1978, decided on 10th October, 1978.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

-- S. 497-Bail of petitioner accused of murder pressed on ground that only proverbial 'lalkara' attributed to petitioner and weapon of offence not recovered-Bail allowed, in circumstances.

Khan Badshah v. State 1978 S C M R 77 ref.

K h. Naveed Ahmed for Applicant.

Mazhar Hassan All for the State.

ORDER

It is the case of prosecution that four accused persons including present applicant attacked Muhammad Hanif and inflicted injuries with fire arm who died subsequently in the hospital after 12 days. Initially F. I. R. was registered for offence under section 307/34, P. P C. and subsequently sections were modified to under section 302/34, P. P. C. Interim challan has been submitted. It is stated that the medical report has been obtained which shows that deceased died due to injuries he has sustained as stated above but no post mortem examination has been performed.

The learned counsel for the applicant has argued that he has applied for bail of applicant Akram against whom there is only allega tion of lalkara. 1t is further stated Akram was not armed, no weapon was recovered from him, and no other active part was played by him in the attack except the lalkara. It is argued that the question whether section 34, P. P. C. would apply to involve applicant Akram in the offence is to be decided by the trial Court after evaluation of evidence. He has relied upon 1978 S C M R 77 in which the bail was granted to accused who had held the, deceased in order to facilitate attack of other co accused. Consequently applicant Akram is allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety and P. R. in the like amount to the, satisfaction of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Ziarat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.