BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEPCO LTD., KHANEWAL ROAD, MULTAN versus ABID SARWAR
Article 46 The Industrial Relations Act (V 2008, of IV), Section (xxix) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition petitioner filed a complaint in the Labor Court against the employers on the basis that they were Assistant Relations Officer was included as a Public Works Officer. \ Labor Grievance was allowed by the Labor Court without authorization to define and remove worker grie. Employers moved an appeal before the High Court, The Labor Appellate Tribunal, which dismissed the appeal by the Labor Appellate Tribunal, held that the applicants were of the view that in their one year employment upon completion, On the grounds that the employers were retained in the job, the applicant had proved before the Labor Court that he was performing manual / academic duties.The witness stated that the applicant did not enjoy any power of rent and removal. And was assigned a continuation of the act as a workman`s applicant in the position of the applicant as the assignor `` was taken by the employer against the Assistant Public Relations Officer by the applicant. The dispute has been ruled out that he was recruited for a record of only one year, which revealed that The applicant was appointed against the regular post, both forums were valid and, in their jurisdiction, allowed to request complaints. The High Court dismissed the petitioner's constitutional application. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
