Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHUJAAT MIRZA versus STATE


The Criminal Code Code (CRPC) Section 497 bail has not been delayed by prosecution nor due to misuse of judicial proceedings, there is no guarantee of bail.

1979 P Cr. L J 760

[Karachi]

Before Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim, J

SHUJAAT MIRZA---Applicant

versus

THE STATE---Respondent

Bail Application No. 1165 of 1.977, decided on 2nd January, 1978.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

--- S. 497--Bail - Delay-Neither caused by prosecution nor amounting to abuse of process of Court-Held, no ground for bail-[Delay].

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

--- S. 497-Bail-Evidence-Circumstantial evidence can be basis of conviction-Contention regarding circumstantial evidence, being very weak-Question, held, cannot be appraised at bail stage-Prosecu tion not responsible for delay in trial of case, such delay not cause of process of Court-Bail refused.--[Evidence].

Choudhry Iftikhar Ahmad for Applicant.

Usman Ghani Rashid, Asstt. A.-G. for the State.

Date of hearing : 2nd January, 1978.

JUDGMENT

FAKHRUDDIN G. EBRAHIM, J.

-The applicant is charged with an offence under section 302/307, P. P. C. and in support of this bail applica tion on his behalf it is firstly urged that according to the prosecution itself the evidence against the applicant is circumstantial only and secondly, there has been considerable delay, for though the applicant was arrested as far back as early 1974 the trial is yet to commence. The learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi in a well-reasoned order found no substance in these two grounds and rejected the bail applica tion. For the same reasons I find no merit in this application. 3t is l not denied that a person can be convicted on the basis of circumstantial evidence but it was contended that this evidence is very weak in the present case but then it is not open to me at this stage to appraise the; evidence for any finding given is bound to embarrass the trial. As regards the delay, undoubtedly four years have passed and no progress has been) made in the case but the prosecution cannot be blamed for the same and it cannot therefore, be said that the delay caused amounts to an abuse of process of Court. While dismissing this application, I however, direct the trial Court to record the evidence of the material witnesses, within two months from the receipt of this order.

Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Lodhran lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.