Sections 10 and 16 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 498 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the offense of adultery, seducing a woman and her ex-husband, and by whom he was detained Was divorced verbally, it was a question of fact that he justified the marriage of the accused with his second husband and the seven years of permanent cohabitation, and then in fact there was a controversial question. Pursuant to the facts, it is possible for the parties to prepare relevant evidence only after the accused sued her ex-husband for dissolving the marriage on the basis of khalid. What was the case, which was dismissed for non-prosecution, the first time the accused was presented in his marriage, the accused's husband was accused of producing a fake and fraudulent divorce, which was filed in the relevant union council. Serious charges were leveled against the accused and her current husband in an invalid FIR, and during the investigation, both of them were found guilty of questioning the High Court over their use of constitutional jurisdiction. Had no jurisdiction to search. Given the constitutional jurisdiction, a trial could not be allowed before the competent court. The termination of the FIR alleging serious accusations against the accused and his accomplice would be equivalent to turning the investigation into a case which was not lawful, the constitutional application was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
