RAZIA BIBI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRANWALA
Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the recovery of articles of dowry was dismissed by the Family Court and the Court of Appeal simultaneously for the recovery of articles on the dowry. Had a father who admitted that he did not give the dowry articles to the plaintiff at the first marriage, in which case the plaintiff's father did not give the dowry articles at the time of his second marriage with the plaintiff. Were. He had no impression of a thumb on the list of dowry articles and that his lawyer wrote the price of dowry articles. And they did not know when the list of the dowry articles was prepared. No witness was presented, in which case the contents of the dowry were handed over to the defendant or his family. Scanned the evidence appropriately and momentarily, and unanimously agreed that the plaintiff had not been given any dowry article: On the final determination of the fact of the two courts of competent jurisdiction, it had high constitutional jurisdiction. The court cannot be interfered with when the plaintiff failed to identify any jurisdiction in the judgment. The two courts below the constitutional petition were excluded
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
