Find a Lawyer

RAZZAQ AHMED NADEEM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 199 (1) (3) of Pakistan Army Act (XXXIX of 1952), punished by summary military court and referred to in section 40 constitutional petition against the dismissal of the applicant under Pakistan Army Act 1952. That the judicial confession is bound to prove guilt The High Court was expressly banned by Article 199 (3) of the Constitution until it issued an order in relation to the member of the Armed Forces of Pakistan unless it was neglected. The verdict is not against the principles of natural justice or unlawfully passed or all remedies under the law without jurisdiction; Prior to the appeal, the appeal was dismissed. Applicant failed to identify any illegal interference or legal error in disqualified decisions

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1698
• RASHID KAREEM v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2010 YLR 1702
• MAZHAR IQBAL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1702
• IJAZ MAHMOOD alias JAJJU v. State 2010 YLR 1704
• JAVED AKHTAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1707
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through D.O.R. Layyah 2010 MLD 1708
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1709
• MUHAMMAD TAJ v. State 2010 MLD 1711

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best law firm from Charsada lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes