Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH D.O.R. LAYYAH

Section 20 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A. XXXXX, Rr 1 and 2 Application for the Grant of Temporary Order of Prohibition The trial court and the Court of Appeal rejected a simultaneous application for the grant of a temporary injunction, both orders well It was argued and within the parameters of the canal and the Drainage Act, 1968 and the petitioner did not indicate any illegality in the said orders under which both of the following courts properly applied for a temporary injunction. Was denied, no judicial error identified in the orders given by both the courts Was done The following two courts could not have interfered with the dismissal of the High Court Petition's review jurisdiction.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MAZHAR IQBAL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1702
• IJAZ MAHMOOD alias JAJJU v. State 2010 YLR 1704
• RAZZAQ AHMED NADEEM v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 MLD 1704
• JAVED AKHTAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1707
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1709
• MUHAMMAD TAJ v. State 2010 MLD 1711
• QADEEMI IMAM BARGAH v. Syed MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN SHAH 2010 MLD 1714
• ABDUL RAZZAQ alias KARIM KHAN v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM CHAUDHRY, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE 2010 PCrLJ 1717

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

top advocates from Attock lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes