Section 42 suits for the declaration in advance of the interest of the plaintiff in the interest of the plaintiff when the disputed mansion was purchased in 1940 in section 42 of the Punjab Population Rural Act (1 of 1995). The profession was in the possession of the mansion, the tenant of the tenancy in the suit separated the mansion from one of the plaintiffs in 1986. Suit property not eligible for separation, trial court decides appeal, court reveals The plea filed by Dua was accepted, which was disclosed, and the evidence presented by the witnesses shows that the defendant's predecessor was in possession of the suit mansion before 1940, there is no evidence on record. It is shown that the defendants had never paid any rent to the defendants who could not furnish any evidence to them. Prove that the defendants had been in the possession of the mansion since 1940, so the suit filed in 1992 for the declaration and acquittal resulted in the suit being located in the village of Haveli, as the defendants were landless persons under the Eternal Day Act. Under Part 3 of the Punjab Confirmation of Proprietary Rights of Individual Proprietors, he became the absolute owner of the mansion. The 1995 revision was excluded as being meritless
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
