The OI, R10 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), applied for the applicant's party parental identification for proof in section 42 suit, as a party to the trial court's declaration on this basis Allowed the applicant and an M. The real brothers were the respondents who believed that the applicant's father and an M were two different persons. The respondent further claimed that the national identity card was not the definitive proof of any person's parents. The applicant's legal heirs wanted to present some other credible evidence that could have invalidated the jamabandi in 1942. 43 There was no evidence on record, as presented by either party, about the identity of the legatee. It shows that the applicant M was the son of the plaintiff's witness's mother's first husband, who did not know the name of the applicant's real father Jamabandi whose release date was not mentioned as All was before the partition of the continent. The record revealed that the petitioner and M were two brothers. According to the facts of the two courts below, the record of the results was identified as invalid or non-read. The review request was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
