Article 199 Companies Ordinance of Companies (XLVII of 1984), Liability of the Company against the High Court Maintenance Company by Sections 305 and 306 Constitutional Jurisdiction, Responding to Determination of Directions to Company Under Company Ordinance, 1984 Was incorporated, and engaged in his business. Money transfers were charged at various locations around the world that the company had cheated its customers and an FIR was lodged against the company, and its chief executive, the High Court, recovered the money from its customers. Initiated automatic action against the company for payment. It was taken up by the defendant company that it was a company incorporated under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, which could not be prosecuted and its assets could not be paid under the Companies Ordinance, 1984. The company can resign under the ordinance of the company. , But at the same time, the company was responsible for making some criminal acts or omissions due to any loss or injury caused by the good court. The Federal Court directed the Federal Investigation Agency to have the State Bank of Pakistan Petition. The amount of security should be disposed of accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
