Section 302 Law The testimony of the witness (10 of 1984), Article 129 (G) Qatil Ahmed The testimony of the witnesses The benefit of the doubt was that the witnesses were neither resident of the place nor had any business at the time of the incident. They were witnesses of the occasion and witnesses could not provide any specific reason for their visit to the village / township that they allegedly went to for a piece of work that was out of the way of the town. Contradictory statements about the means of transportation that he used to reach the bus stand. The complainant stated that they proceeded by bicycle while another witness testified that they had approached a Tonga complainant and the witness said the accused threw both men into the canal after being stabbed in their presence but The fact is, this incident has taken a lot of time and effort. The witnesses could easily control the suspect, who was armed with just one burglar, but did nothing to save the victim. Instead, he left the police station to report the incident. Her behavior in the incident, her presence at the scene of the incident, denied the most important witness, the deceased woman's husband. The person who took the complainant and the other witnesses, was not presented by the prosecution and was dismissed for no immediate reason, thus, according to the law, legal under section 129 (g) of the law There may be options, which are 1984 witnesses. The dead body of the victim was not mentioned at the time and place of recovery. The alleged motive is that the accused designed the daughter of the deceased woman, who forbade the accused from coming to her house. Was given. Because of this fact
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
