Find a Lawyer

FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, FAISALABAD versus GHULAM FATIMA

Section 42 Plaintiff's Impact A lawsuit was filed against the plaintiff in order to give effect to the fact that his predecessor had allotted the plaintiffs in interest but the aforesaid allotment was not disclosed. The court dismissed the appeal case filed by the plaintiff. The trial court's permission and decision and ruling were set aside by the appellate court. The appellate court's decision and order of defendants is very clear in the behavior of the defendants. Given the last opportunity, once again the last opportunity was provided but the defendant did not appear, there was no other way but to decide the appeal based on the record that the appellate court had, the defendant's attitude. I was talking about something else. The appellate court was not contradicted by the defendants in the review petition; the high court did not find anything illegal. The decision and order passed by the appellate court review petition dismissed the deficiency or weakness. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MAQSOOD AHMAD v. Malik MUHAMMAD AFZAL 2010 CLC 1152
• AMANAT KHAN v. NAZIR KHAN 2010 CLC 1153
• RASHID HUSSAIN v. State 2010 YLR 1154
• IRFAN alias FANI v. State 2010 MLD 1155
• NAWAB KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 1156
• SHAFIQUE SHAH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1156
• BASHIR AHMAD v. State 2010 MLD 1159
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MULTAN through Director-General, Multan 2010 YLR 1161

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best law firm from Naudero lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes