MALIK MUHAMMAD SHOAIB BHUTTA, EDITOR, DAILY TULOU, ISLAMABAD versus ABDUL AZIZ MOHMAND
Sections 198 and 439 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 499/500/501/502A Defamation Respondent filed a complaint against the accused applicant who alleged that it was published in his paper. The accused, under section 499/500/501/502 A, PPC, after recording conclusive evidence to the complainant's head to the Complainant Group of News Papers, Companies, his news channel as well as its CEO, the trial court Was summoned by the accused under Section 265, the CRPC was rejected by the trial court under an impugned order, the main reason for the accused was because the complainant A victim was not specified in Section 198, Section 198 Cr PC was not going to comply. The CRPC specifically provided that a complaint be filed by `personb ', which includes not only one person but one body or associate, to prosecute the crime of defamation. ? On the one hand, the crime of a company and notoriety can also be against the body of a person, jurist or person who was not defined in Pakistan's code of conduct as the word 'grieving', but according to its literal vocabulary an angry person is That the legal right was attacked by the Complaints Act and the circumstances of the case will be considered so that if a person lodges a complaint along with the complaint listed in the contents of his complaint, Has been done The trial court, in many words, was particularly enraged that the defamatory material published by the accused, not only stated that the group of news papers / companies had been harmed by their credibility, but also Personal ability
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
