MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus MEMBER JUDICIAL-II, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 163 Land Development Act (XV of 1949), Article 21 and 36 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition The land of the predecessor was acquired under the same Development Act 1949 and in lieu of the acquired land. The adjustment was declared liable. Challenged the Adjustment Order before the tax-related classification, claiming that it was seizing the suit, filed two appeals and successfully verified, the Board of Revenue accepted the review petition filed by the plaintiff applicant. What the Member of the Board of Revenue did not have In addition to allowing the landlord's question to be reviewed, the time restriction was imposed which stated that the land under the Adjustment Scheme was verified by the Colonial Officer in the presence of the respondents' representatives. But they never challenged this order on any appropriate forum. Either day the review was not answered under section 163 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967; the order could only be reviewed on fresh grounds, or the evidence could not be presented when the order was passed. , Or because of a mistake or omission in the record when no basis was available. On Monday, the Board of Revenue granted a constitutional request to allow the request for review, and the unclean order of the Board of Revenue was set aside.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
