Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

JALLUNDUR CO-OPRATIVE TRNPT.SOCIETY LTD. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER


In the Section 3 Association, the evaluation of the word person in section 3 means a natural person and not a legal entity, such as the Cooperative Society, according to which it should be assessed as an association of individuals and not an individual. As [words and phrases]

P L D 1977 Supreme Court 479

Present : Muhammad Yaqub Ali. C. J., Qaisar Khan and Muhammad Haleem, JJ

JULLUNDUR CO-OPERATIVE TRANSPORT SOCIETY LTD.-Appellant

versus

THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER-Respondent

Civil Appeal No. 50 of 1975, decided on 6th April 1977.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 16-2-1965 in W. P. No. 1810 of 1964).

Income-tax Act (XI of 1922)

-- S. 3-Association, assessment of-Word "individual" in S. 3 Means a natural person and not a legal entity such as co-operative society-Society, accordingly, held, to be assessed as an association of persons and not as an individual.-[Words and phrases].

Punjab Province v. The Federation of Pakistan P L D 1956 F C 72 ref.

Javald Hashmi, Advocate and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant.

Sh. Abdul Haq, Senior Advocate for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 6th April 1977.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, C. J

.-The question raised in this appeal by Jullundur Co-operative Transport Society Ltd., Lyallpur, assesses, is whether it is liable to be assessed to tax for the years 1956-51, 1957-58, 1958-59 and 1959-60 as an individual or an association of persons. The liability to assessment is otherwise not disputed.

If the appellant's status is that of an individual within the purview of section 3 of the Income-tax Act, its members cannot be made personally liable for payment of tax. But in case the appellant is assessed as an association of persons then the liability falls on each and every member of the society. The purpose of this appeal, therefore, is to avoid the liability of the members of the appellant society to pay tax for the assessment years 1956-57, 1957-58 195E-59 and 1959-60.

I1 is pointed out by Sh. Abdul Haq, learned counsel for the respondent that in The Punjab Province v. The Federation of Pakistan PLD19556FC72 this Court has, on good authority and for cogent reasons held that after the amendment of section 3 in 1939 the term 'individual' means a natural person and not a legal entity as is claimed by the appellant before us.

After the citation of the aforementioned case, Mr. Hashmi, learned counsel for the appellant expressed the desire to withdraw the appeal. He is allowed to do so but before dismissing the appeal we would like to observe that we are in complete accord with the view expressed in The Punjab Province v. The Federation of Pakistan that the term 'individual' in section 3 or the Income-tax Act means a natural person and not a legal entity such as co-operative society. The society is, accordingly, to be assessed as an association of persons and not as an individual.

The appeal in dismissed with costs.

S. Q. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Ratto Dero lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.