MUHAMMAD JAVED versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, FAISALABAD
Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction The High Court scope petitioner sought relief from the High Court for the order of the appellate court which confirmed the order passed by the Family Court. That had all the facts of the case. After appraising the entire facts, the Appellate Court's final finding was considered legal, which was neither illegal nor defamatory in any way unless the order of the subordinate court was illegal. Unless the Constitutional Jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be granted. , Crooked or defective in accordance with the exercise of jurisdiction. The fact that even through an evidence can lead to a different conclusion, there was no reason for requesting a constitutional jurisdiction that there could be a misinterpretation of the evidence as a result of which the patent did not interpret the evidence. Evidence that can lead to different conclusions will not be a valid reason for consistent exercise.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
