FABNUS CONSTRUCTION (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE/DIRECTOR versus IFTIKHAR AHMAD
Submission of Section 17 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 158 Award-Making Court Order Extending Time to Trial Court, Copy of Award Copy was granted to Respondent on 7/7, 2007 and to Trial Court on 12 12 Had appeared. The 2007 trial court refused to create a court award roll based on the objections that the respondents filed for more than thirty days, the notice of justification for filing the award properly presented to the defendants. Who had to file objections against the award by 11 1. The objections were filed on 29 1, 2008, which were not punctual over time and no attempt was made to explain the delay, therefore, the trial court had no authority or There was no jurisdiction for which time could be extended. In filing objections, the trial court found that the deadline for filing objections would begin on the same day that the award was sealed, had no legal basis and knew the wrongful respondents from 24 and 2007 onwards. Notice about the award, which was proved by the fact that they filed their objections on 29 1, 2008, long before the award was sealed, the objections filed by the defendants against the award for a longer period. After being filed by Article 158 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the trial itself became a trial and equivalent to its own motion The contempt of court could not be contemplated under the jurisdiction of the tribunal, the order passed by the trial court was unreasonable and without jurisdiction. By Respondents
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
