Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DIAMOND ICE FACTORY versus SHER BANG


Section 3 and 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, claim for compensation dependency for fatal accident compensation payments (by the commissioner) and the amount already collected by employees, as well as the insurance company, which is joint, comprehensive and The compensation amount can be claimed from either of these employers, the insurance company has already deposited the claim amount.

1977 P L C 349

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind]

Present: Ghulam Rasool Sheikh, Appellate Tribunal

DIAMOND ICE FACTORY

versus

SHER BANG

Appeal No. WCK‑7 of 1974, decided on 25th June 1975.

Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923)‑--

‑‑ Ss. 3 & 30‑Fatal accident‑Liability for payment of compensation Claim of dependant for compensation allowed (by Commissioner) and amount already deposited by employee‑Contention that since deceased was insured liability for payment of compensation was transferred to Insurance Company‑Liability of employer as well as Insurance Company, held, coextensive and amount of compensation can be claimed from either of them‑Employer, having already deposited amount entitled to claim same from Insurance Company.

Riazul Hasan for Appellant.

S. A. Channa for Respondent.

DECISION

This is an appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

2. Qasim, husband of the respondent, was in the employment of the appellant. He died as a result of the injuries received during the course of and arising out of employment. The respondent filed the claim and Rs. 10,000 were allowed. Aggrieved by this the present appeal had been filed.

3. The only ground taken before me by the learned counsel for the appellant is that since the deceased was insured the liability for the payment of compensation was transferred to the Insurance Company and although an application was moved in the Labour Court for impleading Insurance Company as a party but the application was wrongly rejected. I have consi dered this contention and I am of the view that although the Insurance Company was liable to pay compensation but the liability of the appellant was not thereby discharged. The liability of the appellant as well as Insurance Company is co‑extensive and the amount of compensation can be claimed from either of them. The appellant is entitled to claim the amount from the Insurance Company and, if so advised, may institute suitable proceeding against the insurance company as the amount of compensation has already been deposited by the appellant. The appeal is dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Jalozai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.