RASHED ALI versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN
Article 199 Constitutional Application Academic Institute Examination Petitioner / Candidate claimed that he had failed an article due to the enmity and misconduct of two professors; one of the two professors stated on oath that he was an internal examiner. , But the paper in question was examined by an external inspector who evaluated the paper numbers in question, Syed Professor added that being an Internal Auditor only marks with similar marks and minus 5 numbers. On what they didn't even do. The External Examiner's lawyer, satisfied with his marks, citing the comments made by the university authorities to the university, made it clear that the applicant's application to the University had been thoroughly examined in this regard. And authorized authorities are satisfied with the correct marking. According to the rules, the application was rejected on three occasions, found to be merely misconduct, especially in the context of the internal inspector's statement that the applicant was specifically a party to the constitutional application.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
