Find a Lawyer

SAFDAR versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Narcotic Material Stances Control Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) and possession of 15 drug bail, direct detention of the accused did not yield a further investigation marijuana grant whether the suspect was aware of the presence of Or not. The question was whether the car was intoxicated or he shared knowledge with his co-accused that he was taking drugs with them, which was a question that would be decided after the recording of the evidence except for the accused in the car. Apart from the presence, there was no other incident that recorded the crime or even the record showing his relationship with the car as all the facts were made because one of the accused in the inquiry was admitted on bail. I

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. GHULAM SHAFIA 2010 YLR 2236
• MUHAMMAD TUFAIL v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDI BAHUDDIN 2010 YLR 2243
• Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR v. State 2010 YLR 2248
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. Mst. AZIZ FATIMA 2010 YLR 2253
• Mst. WAZIRAN MAI v. HAQ NAWAZ 2010 YLR 2260
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 YLR 2267
• DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE v. MUHAMMAD JAMSHAID 2010 YLR 2272
• Dr. MUHAMMAD AMJAD v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD 2010 YLR 2279

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

female advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes