DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE versus MUHAMMAD JAMSHAID
Section 8 of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), the removal of the contentious property to Section 13 tenants was beyond the jurisdiction of the municipal corporation, the plaintiff sought to remove the tenant of the disputed property for personal use. Sue and default on payment of rent. The trial court upheld the appeal court's dismissal order, remanding the case to the trial court with observation that the disputed property was outside the bounds of the municipal corporation and the trial court decided the case as a civil court and not After the Rent Controller Trial Court ruled again that the plaintiff was dismissed by the appellate court, without a pending payment of rent, the defendants' position was that the disputed property was outside the bounds of the municipal corporation. But the controller could not have jurisdiction in this matter. The trial court expressly stated that it was obliged to hear the case as a civil suit. D Diet Sheet was not prepared as a request for rent, which supported the argument that the trial court had granted The case was decided as a civil court and not one of the rent controllers failed to deny defendant's claimant ownership of the disputed property. Sales Deadline Plaintiff's Seller's Footwear Defendants failed to identify any illegality; a review petition was dismissed by the High Court for not reading the false statements or evidence. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
