Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus STATE


Section 2302 (b) The testimony of Qatil-e-Amad evidence was excluded from the benefit of the suspect, and on the basis of a single set of witnesses there was no independent coordination available on record to convict the present accused. The gun and crime cases recovered from the suspect were taken to the forensic science laboratory, saying the articles were sent to the laboratory after the arrest of the suspects, so, depending on the report of the forensic science laboratory, in particular. When the accused was not released in his statement under Section 2342, the CCPC co-accused was assigned to the accused with a similar character, who was acquitted by the trial court on the benefit of the suspect, who was charged. Doubts were taken advantage of and conditions were overcome.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Mehrab Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.