Find a Lawyer

IMDAD HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 141414 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XX XX XX of XXV), Section (C) of the drug seizure Bond Sessions Court granted the applicants bail to the defendants in the case after being taken into custody. After the seizure, a fine of Rs 100 was imposed on each of them. Reducing the penalty to 1/5 or 1 penalty for his failure and penalty / Tenth was just a funny thing and people were encouraged to go to the fugitive session court while the gentleman Stance had already been reduced to only the% the fines imposed on the applicants in the present case 50%, r App unknown order did not warrant any interference. N

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• THE STATE through Force Commander Regional Directorate ANF, Rawalpindi v. ABDUL JABBAR alias JABBARA 2010 YLR 2911
• KHADIM HUSSAIN v. State 2010 YLR 2919
• MUHAMMAD MANSHA v. State 2010 YLR 2926
• Mst. ASIFA BIBI v. State 2010 YLR 2928
• MANZOOR AHMAD v. State 2010 YLR 2932
• WAJID ALI v. State 2010 YLR 2933
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD RANA v. Ch. M. SHAFIQUE 2010 YLR 2935
• INAYAT BIBI v. AMJAD ALI 2010 YLR 2936

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

when you need a advocate from Muridkay lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes