Article 7 FF F / 7 i7 L (i) / mah 34 Hashima and the value of the evidence was only dismissed by the independent witness in this case when he saw the complainant and the accused fighting. Was within acre distance. Each other and they were unable to identify which of the injured witnesses did not hurt the prosecution witness, nor was the accused involved in the police action, nor was the police's statement recorded if the prosecution's witness statement was true. If proved, the disclosures filed by the courts below to record the conviction of the accused would lead to misinterpretation of the evidence which the prosecution was bound to prove against the accused, the conclusion reached by the lower courts was not legal. Otherwise the accused had almost completed the entire sentence. It seems that the trial was unlawfully punished and the accused was acquitted of the court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
