MIR DAD versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB
Sections 156 and 173 of the Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 (6) of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/427/148/149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 of the Constitution of Pakistan ( 1973), Article 199 Qatil Imd, attempted murder conviction, mismanagement which resulted in loss of fifty rupees, riot with deadly weapons, committing legal action against the common purpose of unlawful assembly, committing terrorism Constitution. The request was challenged in the Second Inquiry, the inspector general of police had approved the DSP's second change in the inquiry order, the Investigation Branch said. , Whether the police authorities were also given the option to resume investigation in connection with the crime, which was the reason why they had already filed a report under CRPC in Article 18 of Article 18 (6) of the Police Order 2002 Has been made, the legislative board was empowered to recommend a re-investigation of the case even after it was subordinate. In this case, the challan's n and such investigation cannot be abolished. The job of the investigating officer was to collect all relevant evidence related to the allegations of crime in this case in order to ascertain the truth and the court to administer it. Provide assistance to facilitate. Justice between the parties Continued investigation into the matter, Superior Courts dismissed the matter with the intention of avoiding inappropriate repetition, but how the subsequent invoice, which was almost complete to be presented in court, was stopped. May be dismissed or dismissed. Even under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, the challan was subsequently submitted to the court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
