Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE


Sections 497 (2) and 498 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) found hanging from a tree hanging in the throat are just proof against the applicant that the victim was last seen in his company earlier. The day was seen alive, and the petitioners added an extra judicial confession for two non-important persons in another village, if the applicants had difficulty in concealing their guilt by showing that the victim had committed suicide. , There was no ground reason to go to them and it made two unimportant people clean. Which cannot be sued, guaranteed, authorized and applicant in any way under section 497 (2).

1977 P Cr .L J 455

[Lahore]

Before Aslam Riaz Hussain, J

GHULAM MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 710/B of 1973, decided on 14th March 1973.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--‑

‑‑ Ss. 497(2) & 498‑Bail‑Deceased found hanging from a tree with a noose around his neck‑Only evidence against accused petitioners being that deceased was last seen alive in their company earlier in day and of petitioners having made an extra‑judicial confession to two unimportant persons of another village‑Contention that if petitioners took trouble to conceal their guilt by making it appear that deceased committed suicide, no earthly reason appeared for them to have gone and made a clean breast of it to two unimportant persons who could not help him in any manner, held, plausible and petitioners' case covered by S. 497(2)‑‑Bail allowed.

Muhammad Rashid Chughtai for Petitioners.

Sh. Muhammad Usman for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for grant of bail by Ghulam Muhammad, Sher and Yaqub under section 497/498, Cr. P. C. They are accused of an offence under section 302/34, P. P. C. for the murder of Nazir Ahmad (deceased) vide F. I. R. No 121/72, dated 15‑8‑1972. According to the F. I. R. lodged by Muhammad Nawaz, the brother‑of the deceased, one Abdur Rehman raised a noise whereupon he along with some others rushed up to him. Abdur Rehman informed them that the dead body of Nazir Ahmad (deceased) was hanging from a rope. The complainant and his companions went with him to the river bank and saw that Nazir Ahmad was hanging from a tree with a noose around his neck. At the end of the F. I. R. the complainant has mentioned that he has strong suspicion against Ghulam Muhammad, Sher and Yaqub petitioners and one Yusuf son of Sher. According to the petitioners they have been arrested and are under detention for the last seven months merely on suspicion, without there being any proof against them. I issued notice to the State and directed that the investigating Officer should be present on the next date of hearing. The latter is present today and has submitted that the only evidence against the petitioners is that one witness has stated that he had seen the deceased alive in the company of the petitioners earlier in the day. Moreover, the petitioners had made an extra‑judicial confession to Waryam and Fazil P. Ws. on the very day on which the F. I. R. was lodged. He has admitted that These two persons are not men of any importance and belong to another village,

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners argued drat if the petitioners had taken the trouble to conceal their guilt by making it appear that the deceased had hanged himself with a rope and had committed suicide, there was no earthly reason for them to have gone and made a clean breast of it t two unimportant persons, who could not help them in any manner, I am inclined to agree with this submission and feel that the petitioners' case is covered by subsection (2) of section 497, Cr. P. C. As such they are granted bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties each in the like amount to tire satisfaction of the Assistant commissioner Lyallpur.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Laliah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.