ZAHID ULLAH versus N.-W.F.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH CHAIRMAN, PESHAWAR
Article 199 The Competitive Examination of the Provincial Public Service Commission according to the Schedule of Essential Articles revealed that the article of General Knowledge was divided into three subjects, even though an article was shown, as well as in Political Science, Physics or Chemistry. Articles were shown as one. Although the schedule of the optional subjects was divided into two articles, the applicant claimed that due to these circumstances, the numbers should be calculated on the basis of their aggregate and since the second examinations required pass numbers in the compulsory and optional subjects. They were calculated upon doing so. Based on the overall premise, it could not be worked with different courtyards. And that the provisions in the syllabus cannot be justified as discrimination and violation of the equality clause, once it was not disputed that general knowledge was an essay, as well as political science, physics or chemistry. If so, the pass numbers should be calculated. The Federal Public Service Commission's Civil Superior Science Provision Examination was carried out in aggregate, which provides a different venue for calculating passing numbers that explicitly prohibits discrimination and constitutional clauses before the law. Will be violated. Uniformity was an unmistakable indication of the oppressed, that the applicant could not refuse the voice-voice test while submitting compulsory and optional articles. And that the proportional terms of discrimination and violation of the equality clause cannot be maintained in every paper of the article, the Public Service Commission officials
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
