Section 48, and AXXI, R 32, the application for execution of the Order of Order was barred from restraining the application for a six-year period for the execution of the Order. The decree sought to implement the existing injunction was a declining statement, although the decree was not implemented, but under the provisions of OXI, R32, CPC. The order was implemented, since it was not a CPC, since the period provided under section 48. The order does not apply to the enforcement of the prohibition, nor was any such restriction period provided in the Civil Procedure Code 1908 or under the Limitation Act 1908, the provisions of subsection Rules 1 and 5 of the CXCR Will take effect. And the defendant shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of this law. The two courts below have failed to consider these cases in the context of AXXI, R 32, CPC. Impressive rulings and orders dealing with material misconduct and irregularities Impressive decisions and orders of both the above courts were set aside and the execution petition filed by the petitioners / petitioners was not banned. Was. And he was sent back to the Executive Court for processing under the provisions of OXI, R32, CPC.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
