MST. NAJIA TEHSEEN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY SERVICES AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR
Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Citizens' Appointment claimed that the authorities, irrespective of the law, rules and regulations, recommended the names of respondents for recruitment while one respondent was from the zone, but this The name of the was recommended from the zone quota. II from where the applicant praised the applicant and said that the defendant obtained the same number and said that the defendant was proposed for appointment as the applicant was less than 14 days of age (Regln 33 (3) of the Service Regulations) (In light of) the defendants again took the position of the applicants. She was married before joining the government job and because of her marriage, her husband's residence was considered on her recommendation, the respondent's husband was a resident of Zone II, his name was Zone II. It was recommended that, according to the authorities' recommendation, no illegal act or jurisdiction may be exercised by the relevant rules, powers, interference with the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
