Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAID versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 498 Guaranteed pre-arrest, charged with murder, Hecht Bell liable to seriously injure complainant before arrest

1977 P Cr. L J 331

[Lahore]

Before Gulbaz Khan, J

SAID‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3197‑B of 1976, decided on 23rd August, 1976.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

--S.498‑Bail before arrest‑Petitioner, accused of murderous assault, responsible for inflicting grievous injuries to complainant with a hatchet‑Bail declined in circumstances.

Ch. Muhammad Siddique for Petitioner.

S. M. Anwar for the State.

ORDER

The learned counsel contended that there was a delay of 17 hours in lodging the F. I. R. of this case; that it was a case of free fight and that the injuries of Mansha co‑accused had not been explained by the complainant in the F. I. R.

2. I have been taken through the F. I. R. of this case. The wall of Hussain fell into the courtyard of Zulfiqar P. W. due to rains and rain water started entering into the room of said Zulfiqar who asked Hussain to remove the mud from his courtyard and it led to exchange of abuses. On hearing noise, Muhammad Din alias Manna complainant alongwith his father Wali Muhammad and Nawab Din P. W., reached the spot and beseeched with Hussain co‑accused. Hussain started abusing Muhammad Din alias Manna complainant and threw a challenge. Hussain armed with stick, said petitioner armed with a hatchet and their co‑accused Sohna and Mansha attacked the complainant. Said opened the attack and gave hatchet blow to Muhammad Din alias Manna. The complainant warded it off by raising his hand with the result that his fingers were chopped off. More injuries were caused to his father Wali Muhammad and Nawab.

3. I have perused the medico‑legal report of the complainant. He had six injuries. Injuries Nos. 4 to 6 are with sharp‑edged weapon. Left little finger was chopped off anal there was profuse bleeding. Injuries ' No. 5 and 6 were on the left wing and left middle finger. This is a corroboration of the statement of the complainant that the blow landed his hand when he tried to ward off the blow. Learned counsel for the petitioner produced the medico‑legal report of Mansha. He has two injuries with sharp‑edged weapon and both injuries are of petty nature. Injury No. 1 was only skin deep. Since the petitioner was responsible for causing grievous injury with sharp‑edged weapon to Muhammad Din alias Manna complainant, I do not consider it a fit case for the grant of bail before arrest. The petition is dismissed. The order of interim bail is recalled. This order shall be without prejudice to the merits of the case. The learned Additional Sessions Judge shall dispose of the bail petition of the co‑accused on merits.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Khuiratta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.