Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. RAZIA versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 1 561 The context of the proceedings is that under Section 6, the offense, since the PPC is unreasonable, cannot be investigated without the permission of the court. A challan to be sent to a magistrate through a PD section PK can be considered a complaint. Interruption to the discharge of public works initiated by public servants

1977 P Cr. L J 328(1)

[Lahore]

Before Mazhar‑ul‑Haq, J

Mst. RAZIA‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4252 of 1968, heard on 11th October 1976.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑ S. 561‑A‑Quashment of proceedings‑Contention that offence under S. 186, P. P. C. being a non‑cognizable one, no investigation could be made without permission of Court nor challan sent to Magistrate through P. D. S. P. could be treated as complaint initiated by public servant obstructed in discharge of his public functions-- Contention, held, correct‑Proceedings quashed, in circumstances. [Quashment of proceedings].

Ch. Muhammad Iqbal for Petitioner.

Ghulam Bari Majal for the State.

Date of hearing : 11th October 1976.

ORDER

Mst. Razia petitioner has applied for the quashment of the proceedings pending against her in the Court of Magistrate 1st Class, Lahore under section 186, P. P. C. initiated on the report of Faizul Hassan A. S. I. who alleged that the petitioner had obstructed him in the performance of his lawful duties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that Faizul Hassan A. S. I. should have filed the complaint in the Court himself. The challan submitted in Court by the P. D. S. P. cannot be treated as a complaint by Faizul Hassan in this case. Moreover, no permission from the Magistrate was obtained for the investigation of this case as the offence was non‑cognizable. In view of the submissions, this petition is accepted and the proceedings before the trial Court are quashed.

Proceedings quashed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Sargodha lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.