Sections 302/452/429/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) appeal against murder, domestic abuse and misconduct with a delay of 45 minutes were filed and explained on the spot. It was not satisfactory by the complainant before the FIR was filed; some preliminary inquiries were made which included preparation of the site plan, including the time of filing notification as well as the time of the incident. , There was no delay in reporting the matter to the police. Properly explained which created the possibility of consultation and deliberation, especially considering the possible preliminary investigation, the FIR's registration case was also fatal to the prosecution case, the prosecution said in this case. Was established, but the prosecution failed to maintain it, the prosecution must face and there is no defense, there is no enmity between the parties, absence of purpose, such as the previous enmity between the parties with other conditions. The feeling had taken hold and they had greatly affected the prosecution's case. The ocular evidence consisted of two witnesses, the father's son, and he was very close to the victim, saying that the witnesses should be carefully considered. Care, especially when their presence on the scene was suspicious, provided that the ocular evidence was untrustworthy and could not be made on the basis of death sentence. Various parameters were used to interfere with the principles of appeal against punishment. Was to be applied. The verdict against the conviction and the appeal against the appeal were reversed when the appellate court intervened if the offender was acquitted.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
