Article 2 303/324 // 34 Q Define and appreciate the evidence. The conviction, the FIR immediately filed, accused the accused of being dropped, leaving the place of counseling and deliberation hardly possible, something that could not be believed. In cases where the prosecution's witnesses had no reason to substitute the accused and go to the real culprits, especially when there was no enmity between the accused and the complaining party, the statements of both witnesses were materialized on the day. They were identical, the time, place, mood and scene of the scene, including the role of the accused and the accused, were not brought to the record by the defense lawyer despite a lengthy defense inspection, both witnesses lost their natural and straight. With the special character of the defendant's statement. The witnesses were found to have found evidence of the affective and reliable medical report as well as circumstance, so according to the prosecution's case, in view of the injury and the time of death and post-mortem, except for stimulation. The IR has alleged that there was no enmity between the parties, that the ocular account was trustworthy and was fully supported by medical evidence. There was no great contradiction and contradiction in the evidence of the prosecution, but it was consistent with the material points; in the case, the prosecutor, without any reasonable doubt, was able to prove his case against the accused, so charged. , The trial court co-accused rightly sentenced. , Who had already died, fired a fatal shot late, while the accused beat both the victim and the injured prosecution witness with a stick.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
