Article 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for Duress Petitioner / Husband claimed that the courts below had erroneously decided five gold jewelry which the petitioner had given to the respondent / wife. But he was taken away. Respondent's wife's confession by the sister of the applicant (husband) that the applicant's sister had snatched the gold jewelry from him; he acquitted her of the responsibility / responsibility because the same sister had taken her away. Who lived in his house. The wife had an unlawful right, if the jewelry was taken away by the husband or his family, the wife had the right to snatch the jewelry through the Family Court, in that regard her silence would be accompanied by consent and consent. ? The gold jewelery performance in Dover will not be converted into a civil proceeding if the husband is taken away or forced, the liability of the respondents / spouse's claim was genuine and rightfully judged by the courts. Was dealt with.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
