Sections 369, 465, 466 and 561A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/324 Qatl e AMd and attempt to maintain review were granted by the court for bail filed by the respondents / accused's brother and The accused was on bail primarily in the light of the medical board's opinion that the applicant / complainant had filed a review petition against the order approving the bail, stating that section 6565 Cr, CRPC and so on The request for bail was not decided after the restriction of appropriate action under. It was liable to review and to set aside the impugned order, the applicant did not raise any objection to the trial in respect of non-compliance with Article 465, CRPC, nor was the defendant angry. Not suffering from such a disease, the court has granted the order to postpone pestilence. Defendant's defense failed to defend himself, nevertheless refusing to release the accused on bail, the complainant did not object to any of the aforesaid objections, and this was the first time a review was filed under section 369. Such objections were raised in the petition, CRPC read with section 555A, decision on the CCPC bail application of the accused based on the medical board's available report and other material related to the patient's illness. had gone. In addition, his order to release his sign-trial trial in custody over his prolonged death was inherently temporary, with the provision of huge bail centers, as well as the fulfillment of the conditions imposed under him. In accordance with the provisions of Section 696969, CRPC will not adjust the revision request. ???
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
