Section 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition for Restoration, Mason's Profit and Loss Trial Trial Court renders the case and decision and the trial court has upheld the appeal court upheld, the plaintiff appealed the constitutional petition. The plaintiff's father had purchased the property from the Sweet Property Municipal Committee through a registered sale deed and after the death of Modi's father / mother the plaintiff was transferred to the deceased owner's legal heir. In the circumstances, the defendant proved to be a tenant, forcibly owning the property he claimed to own. During this period, the defendant also demolished the garage located in the said property. The plaintiff in his written statement admitted that he was the tenant of the plaintiff's property. Through oral and documentary evidence he was able to fully prove his case and he was successful in discharging the responsibility and the burden moved on to the defendant, but he failed to resolve the case. The plaintiff's suit was based on ownership and consequently the settlement by the defendant. Therefore, there may be proceedings under Section 8 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, and the courts below had rightly ruled that no illegal or irregular acts were committed by the courts below, It was said that the constitutional application against several decisions and orders was dismissed, circumstance r. n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
