Sections 302 (B), 324, 337E (IV), 337F (IV), 427, 148 and 149 assassination attempt, Katil M's attempt to confirm and certify the incident, reporting delay of 2 hours 15 minutes The prosecution's evidence was not adequately explained, the doctor who conducted the post mortem said during his cross-examination that the autopsy was brought by the police. I had expressed serious doubts. The delay in filing an FIR in the presence of the complainant and taking his deceased brother to the hospital raised serious suspicion over the incident of the complainant and his brother, of the two injured witnesses, only One presented by him, the prosecutor, who was the grandson of other witnesses who were present by the prosecutor, was not an effective and truthful witness when he withdrew from his position in his statement and complained to his brother, The follower, to the extent that he made the medical evidence, the ocular evidence of eyewitness testimony was not verified. The prosecution's evidence was prepared the next day, not natural in the circumstances and recovered on occasion, although sent to the forensic science laboratory, but its report could not be presented in evidence but was left blank. The absence of a laboratory report about the prosecutor's version raised further doubts whether he was fired from the same weapon or more. The multiple motives of the crime, as stated by the complainant in the FIR, were not proven by the prosecution group through any evidence.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
