Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

THE STATE versus MIRZA MUHAMMAD IQBAL BRIG


Sections 110, 112 and 117 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) along with Section 1 561 were read out and 117 (3) police officers and two witnesses passed the same day after examination Without providing the opportunity to investigate such witnesses or engage with a lawyer, [recovered cases]

1977 P Cr. L J 432

[Karachi]

Before Mushtak Ali Kazi, J

THE STATE‑Applicant

Versus

Mirza MUHAMMAD IQBAL BRIG‑Respondent

Criminal Reference No. 189 of 1975, decided on 12th November 1976.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑ Ss. 110, 112 & 117(3) read with S. 561‑A‑Quashment of proceed ings‑Proceedings started against respondent on ground of being a habitual smuggler of narcotics‑Activities not covered by S. 110, Cr. P. C.‑--Order under Ss. 112 & 117(3) passed on same day after examining Police Officer and two witnesses, without affording an opportunity to respondent to cross‑examine such witnesses or to engage a counsel ‑ Proceedings quashed in circumstances. [Quashment of proceedings].

Nooruddin Sirki for the State.

Muhammad Ali Sheikh for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 12th November 1976.

JUDGMENT

This is a reference by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi recommending that an order passed under section 117(3), Cr. P. C. by S. D. M., City Karachi against the respondent may be quashed. The allega tion against the respondent was that lie was a habitual smuggler of narcotics and a dangerous person. The learned S. D. M. passed an order under section 112 against him on 5th August, 1975 and on the same day he passed another order under section 117(3), Cr. P. C. after recording brief statement of the S. H. O. and to other persons. It would appear that the main ground for starting these proceedings against the respondent was that he vas smuggler of narcotics. These activities are not covered by section 110. Cr. P. C. More over, no opportunity appears to have been allowed to the respondent to cross‑examine these witnesses or to effectively defend himself by engaging a counsel. I accordingly accept the reference of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge for the reasons stated by him in his order and quash the entire proceed ings including the order under section 117(z), Cr. P. C.

Reference accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Usta Mohammad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.