THE STATE THROUGH DEPUTY PROSECUTOR GENERAL versus MUHAMMAD KALEEM BHATTI
Release of property relating to sections 10, 11, 12, 32 and 33E by referring to the High Court Trial Court while ordering punishment and punishment against the defendant / accused, it was mentioned that the assets / property of the accused were confiscated. Are. Compensation against penalty amount, however, in case of recovery / non-payment / fine, the accused faces two years' additional terms, the trial court in its plea alleging that it had already completed the work. done. The sentence was also sentenced to additional duration in lieu of default and payment of fines, to release the property that was subject to the main reference. The trial court accepted the accused's plea and directed the executive district officer that the properties of the accused. To be released as mentioned in the verdict and in a trial court's finding of distress, the NAB authorities immediately filed an appeal because the properties of the accused were seized as compensation against the penalty amount. Gone, the trial court intended that the property / property, discount case was just a fine It was held that in the event of non-recovery of the amount, the offender / accused will be sentenced to two more years imprisonment, the accused also punished for non-payment of fines. The trial, the trial court's decision was fully processed and the accused could not be punished twice, could not be returned by serving against the payment of fines. The law does not provide double punishment for the accused. That was since the accused completed his entire sentence, including a two-year extension of the fine
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
