Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM ALIAS ASLAM versus STATE

Article 345 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) of the murder was a Muslim to compromise between a Muslim and a non-Muslim, and the legal heirs of the victims were non-Muslims, who were accompanied by their ID card and affidavit in court. Had appeared. And confirmed that with them, the Minister of Human Rights and Minorities along with the accused has agreed that a certificate has been issued stating that the said legal heirs are the sole heirs of the deceased, which is further confirmed on this occasion. A non-Muslim lawyer did too. The court agreement between the parties was accepted in the circumstances and accordingly the accused was acquitted.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010

• ALI KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 11
• ABDUL REHMAN v. PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BALOCHISTAN through Chairman 2010 PLD 16
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DERA ALLAH YAR 2010 PLD 21
• Haji MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. SECRETARY FOREST DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA 2010 PLD 24
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. ABDUL HAMEED 2010 PLD 33
• NOROZ KHAN v. SELECTION COMMITTEE through Chairman 2010 PLD 48
• SOORAT KHAN v. ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, SIBI 2010 PLD 52
• KHALO v. State 2010 PLD 58

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2010 →

famous high court advocate from Daur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes