Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus ABDUL HAMEED

Section 13 Tenant Bona Reveals Landlord's Personal Needs The choice of landlord proof overseas has neither the homeowner's ability to enjoy his or her homeland, nor any other The availability of the property also cannot be the basis for holding it relieved or doubting its misconduct; He said that none of the properties he likes to live in, so it was wrongly decided that the High Court set aside the rent control finding and said The landlord needs premises for personal use and occupation of the landlord. The landlord's statement of entitlement to the property was sufficient to prove the issue of personal necessity was sufficiently set aside by the landlord's order passed by the rent controller and the landlord Filed application exit request allowed under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010

• ABDUL REHMAN v. PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BALOCHISTAN through Chairman 2010 PLD 16
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DERA ALLAH YAR 2010 PLD 21
• Haji MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. SECRETARY FOREST DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA 2010 PLD 24
• MUHAMMAD AZAM alias ASLAM v. State 2010 PLD 30
• NOROZ KHAN v. SELECTION COMMITTEE through Chairman 2010 PLD 48
• SOORAT KHAN v. ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, SIBI 2010 PLD 52
• KHALO v. State 2010 PLD 58
• Mst. GIRAN NAZ alias SHAGUFTA BIBI v. State 2010 PLD 61

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2010 →

power of attorney advocate Issa Khel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes