Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAFI MUHAMMAD SAAND versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH


Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the dismissal of the appellant who was dismissed from employment against the order imposing a minor penalty before the Article 1212 Service Tribunal, was reinstated by the minor. Subsequently, he was retired from employment after attaining the age of the appellant. During the process of collecting the pensionary benefits, the appellant found that he had been fined Rs. The appellant alleged that he had been fined without presenting a charge sheet, making inquiries or giving him a show cause notice. In view of the appellant's restoration order before the service tribunal under which the appellant was fined, it cannot be said that the minor penalty was the result of a separate charge for which a separate department inquiry was initiated. The service tribunal should have done all the investigations. Properly there are no illegal or irregularities in aspects of the case, in an unstated order and no intervention was required.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Khushal Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.