Arts 175A, [inserted by the Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 2010] 1, 17, 17 (4), 27, 38, 45, 46, 48, 51, 58 (2) (b), 62, 63, 63A, 91, 106, 148, 175, 177, 193, 209, 219, 226, 260 and 267A and 184 (3) of the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution Article 185 The constitutional petitions before the applicants were that the Article 175A (as amended by the Constitution (Eighteenth) Amendment) Act, 2, highlighted that certain features of the Constitution violated the independence of the judiciary. Was a nexus of judicial independence with the process of inaction and inaccessible because the judicial commission The nominations were scrutinized by the Parliamentary Committee, which authorized the President to confirm and forward the Commission's nominations to the President for appointment under Articles 175 (12) and (13) of Article 175, A, that the Parliamentary Committee veto powers and Even an Una was given, which could be vetoed by six of the eight members elected to Parliament on the outdated recommendation of the Commission, which is that the registration of Article 75A was Malala's utility. That the appointment of judges will have a negative impact on judicial independence because it may not only politicize the appointment process but otherwise affect the structural rape which was an essential element of judicial independence. That the Supreme Court has the power to judicial review of constitutional amendments, if the infrastructure / features or basic values claimed by the petitioner to abolish the provisions under challenge, the concept of infrastructure was put into service and It was retained. The principle of clear limits on the option to amend the constitution in a number of liberal democracies
