Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-examination of the evidence The medical evidence supported the ocular testimony, the permanent and credible version of the prosecution's testimony at a distance from the doctor's uncertain expression at a potential distance. Can't believe it. This happened in daylight. The accused was known for prosecution witnesses, it was alleged alone that he fired a deadly pistol with the role of which the pistol was recovered from the accused, there is no motive for falsely accusing witnesses. Was. The defendant's molestation, accused of straying college girls by the accused, was the immediate motive for the murder, which proved by contradictory prosecution evidence that there were no material contradictions or serious contradictions in the statements of the prosecution witnesses. The following courts did not demand any interference. The leave to appeal was dealt accordingly.
