Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

WAHID BAKSH versus STATE


Article 185 (3) read with the Criminal Code of Conduct (V of 1981), Section 498 bail, pending appeal before interim bail, pending appeal of High Court is not possible, subject to appeal. It is possible to disagree with the High Court without excluding and, of course, the net: risk during the approval of the appeal

1976 S C M R 134

Present : Muhammad Yaqub Ali, C. J. and Muhammad Gul, J

WAHID BAKSH AND ANOTHER‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 358 of 1975, decided on 12th November 1975.

On appeal from the judgment arid order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 21-8-1975 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 of 1975 in Criminal Appeal No. 715 of 1975).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--

--Art. 185(3) read with Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1981),

S. 498‑Bail, ad interim‑High. Court in appeal pending before it refusing interim bail‑Not possible, held, to differ with High Court without pre‑empting subject‑matter of appeal and such course net :risible during pendency of appeal before High Court‑Petition for leave to appeal to appeal being manifestly misconceived dismissed.

D. M. Arbey, Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan instructed Eyed Inayat Hussain Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing : 12th November 1975.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, C.J.-

The petitioners have preferred an appeal in the High Court against their convictions and sentences to various terms of imprisonment under sections 148, 459, 366 and 323 read with section 149, P. P. C. Prayer for interim bail was refused by a learned Judge against which ‑‑, sick leave to appeal.

The petition has no merit whatever, for, unless we pre‑empt the subject

matter of the appeal ,it will not be possible, to differ with the High Court in the matter of granting interim bail. As such a coarse is not feasible, the petition for leave to appal is manifestly misconceived and is dismissed. The petitioners however, apply to tare High Court early hearing of the appeal.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Tarbela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.