Section 302 (b) Conan Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 129, Elias (G) Qatiel Amad reviewed the evidence The prosecution case was held only on the complainant's sole statement, the testimony of an eyewitness. Was finished and the other eye witnesses. According to the prosecution, the reason for this is that if the testimony of the prosecution was examined in court, its evidence would have been offensive to the prosecution. Oral evidence contradicts medical evidence The complainant's statement was neither endorsed nor supported by any piece of evidence. The complainant's admission that there was no quarrel between the victim and the accused prior to the incident, was alleged 25/26 years old, according to his further admission, the purpose of the highly suspected complainant, the assailant was probably from this place. He could not see the victims where he was standing. Although the estimates are extremely dubious, the capital's charge cannot be safely relied upon. The positive forensic science laboratory report about the evacuation of a gun recovered from a suspect's possession was a controversial piece of evidence. Unable to convict the accused in the absence of a piece of evidence
