After reviewing the decision of Article 292 (b) and Constitution 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Supreme Court, Qatil challenged the identity of the sole accused on the ground that the identity parade was held illegally. And that on a moment-by-moment basis. The identity of the accused could not be properly identified, with the whole evidence being dealt with in depth, which came on the record in a comprehensive way, the magistrate conducted an identity test in which the witnesses identified the accused. ? The prosecution witnesses who testified against them also identified the accused before the trial court and stated their role in connection with the lack of light at the time of the incident, because of the room in which Darius was being given Could not be considered. There is no question whether the prosecution's witnesses could identify the culprits involved in the definition of evidence, which could not be done at the review stage, could not be given on the basis that the court re-established some facts. Needs to be examined, but the desire to reconsider this matter also cannot constitute a valid reason and there is considerable scope for review. There was no merit and was excluded accordingly
