Find a Lawyer

versus

1 and 22 cantonment lands are proposed for commercial use, or Scope State workers responsible for the management of cantonment land were not free agents for transacting a non-governmental organization for business purposes or generating non-military revenue. , But are obliged to ensure this loss. The government should, in such transactions, sell a lease of such land through auction, leasing premium and rent should be benchmarked against market value so as not to damage the public exchequer. When estimating the market value, the actual sale of immovable land for building purposes in the area should be used whenever possible.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• Mirza DILSHAD BAIG v. ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL, SINDH 2010 PLC(CS) 875
• MUHAMMAD HASEEB v. GENERAL MANAGER, PRODUCTION WEAPONS POF WAH CANTT. 2010 SCMR 877
• SADDAQAT ALI KHAN v. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION 2010 PLD 878
• NASRULLAH KHAN v. State 2010 SCMR 881
• EJAZ ALI BUGHTI v. P.T.C.L. 2010 PLC(CS) 899
• BASHIR AHMED v. Mst. TAJA BEGUM 2010 PLD 906
• RIZWANULLAH KHAN, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 909
• Mrs. AFROZ SHAH v. SABIR QURESHI 2010 PLD 913

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Naudero lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes