MUHAMMAD ALTAF versus PAKISTAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
Sections 23 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 1110 and XLV, R1 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, Twenty-seventh, R2 and AXXVI, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 188, 185 ( 2) (d) and ()) to dismiss the first appeal for leave by petition of the High Court for leave, instead of filing a direct appeal under section 54 of the Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Determination, refusal to change such application in such court due to the enforcement of the legal provisions and dismissal as a direct appeal, on the merits of the appeal and timely discharge and The question of any limitation will not be considered in the petition for review of this court's decision. The strictness of the appeals under section 101010, section 45 of the Land Acquisition Act, the treatment of direct appeal under section 44 of the Act under rig Act rigors was the proper remedy, which has the benefit of time. Was not taken in. The maximum limit for direct appeal under section 44 of the Act was expired before 10, 1998, 1998, 1998, 1998, when the applicant filed for leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court. After which the period used to obtain a certified copy was legally excluded. In nature, in which the Supreme Court refused to examine the petitioner in the absence of a petition for defamation, such discretion is being reviewed by the Supreme Court. There was no case filed for review of the judgment. Also, the review application was also dismissed in circumstances
